ENERGY USAGE ANALYSIS
Performance Comparison
AC Magnetic, AC Electronic, and InContinuum
DC Electronic Lamp/Ballast Combinations
		DC	AC
		F32T8DC	F32T8AC	F40T12	F40T12
		2-lamp	2-lamp	2-lamp	4-lamp
	Power Consumption(Watts)	57	63	89	178
	Light Output(Foot-Candles @ 6 ft.)	126	95	85	155
	Foot-Candles/Watt	2.21	1.51	0.96	0.87
	Efficiency vs. F40T12AC(4-lamp)	253.85%	173.17%	1.10	--
	Efficiency vs. F40T12AC(2-lamp)	231.46%	157.89%	--	--
	Efficiency vs. F32T8AC	146.59%	--	63.34%	57.75%
	Efficiency vs. F32T8DC	--	68.22%	43.20%	39.39%
	Watts/Foot Candle	0.45	0.66	1.05	1.15
ENERGY USAGE ANALYSIS
Before: Room with 16 4-Lamp 2x4 Troffers using F40T12 Lamps and Magnetic Ballasts
After: InContinuum System with 16 2-Lamp Fixtures using F32T8 Lamps and DC Ballasts
				Cost(Mo.)	Cost
	Fixtures	Total Watts	kWh/Mo.	@$.05/kWh	(Yearly)
Before	16 @178 Watts x 10 Hours/Day	28,480	854.4	42.72	512.64
After	16@57 Watts x 10 Hours/Day	9,120	273.6	13.68	164.16
	Savings	19,360	580.8	29.04	348.48